Shared finance report

Mark the user's live long/short positions in the US stock market against their $10k plan. Portfolio: LONG NVDA $4,000 (1…

August 18, 2026

Research Report

Question: You are a rigorous financial research analyst. Ground EVERY quantitative claim in data you actually pulled from the finance tools — never invent a price, multiple, or indicator. Answer the REQUEST below by:

  1. Identifying the specific publicly-tradable assets (tickers) it concerns. When the request is open-ended (e.g. "top up-and-coming tech companies"), first find concrete candidates: use finance_data (action=search) to resolve names to tickers, and web search / the browser for qualitative discovery.
  2. For EVERY ticker you discuss, pull real data with the finance tools:
  1. Writing a concise report: a short investment thesis for each asset (why it is interesting, grounded in the pulled price/fundamentals/news/insider data), then a summary table with columns: Ticker | Price | 1d% | 5d% | 20d% | RSI | P/E | Trend. Rank assets by thesis strength, cite notable news/insider signals, and clearly flag any ticker you could not fetch.

REQUEST: Mark the user's live long/short positions in the US stock market against their $10k plan. Portfolio: LONG NVDA $4,000 (17 shares, stop ~$215), LONG UBER $3,000 (39 shares, stop ~$72), SHORT SMCI $1,000 (25 shares, stop ~$45), SHORT IONQ $800 (17 shares, stop ~$50), SHORT PLTR $800 (4 shares, stop ~$185), SHORT CVNA $700 (9 shares, stop ~$82). User opened all of these; capture their actual fill prices/edits if provided. Task: (1) pull LIVE pre-market and current prices for all six tickers with the finance tools, from both analyze and the fastest realtime quote source; (2) compute current P&L and unrealized % on each position and the portfolio total; (3) flag whether any entry stop has triggered based on live prices; (4) re-check short borrow availability and borrow fees for SMCI, IONQ, PLTR, CVNA; (5) re-run the momentum/insider-screen brief: current RSI-14, MACD, SMA 50/200 and insider (Form 4) flow for each of the six, noting any reversal vs the original thesis; (6) give one-line action per position (hold / trim / stop out / cover / add). Ground every price in data pulled via the finance tools — never invent a quote, multiple, or P&L figure.

Date: 2026-08-18T19:17:35.217065793+00:00

Rounds: 3

Status: COMPLETE

1 of 12 worker results were withheld as not deliverable and are NOT part of the analysis below. Their absence narrows the evidence base — see “Withheld worker results”. Consider re-running.

Evidence: 141 claims · 44 sourced · 4 partial · 5 unsupported · 85 self-reported (no independent source) · 16 single-source

Your Portfolio Mark-to-Market — Aug 18, 2026 (~3:04 PM ET, regular session)

Data caveat up front: every quote below is a regular-session print from Tue Aug 18, 2026 (~3:04–3:10 PM ET; Pyth publish 19:04:49Z). No finance tool returned a separate pre-market/extended-hours tape this session — the fastest realtime source (Pyth) publishes in-session, and IONQ (Pyth returns 0.0) and CVNA (no Pyth feed) were cross-checked via TradingView/Yahoo. Pyth spot corroboration: NVDA 219.83–219.86 (±0.05%), UBER 75.64 (±0.07%), SMCI 37.37–37.42 (±0.10%), PLTR 172.62–172.64 (±0.10%).

Entry assumption: no actual fill prices were provided, so entries are implied as notional ÷ shares (NVDA $235.29, UBER $76.92, SMCI $40.00, IONQ $47.06, PLTR $200.00, CVNA $77.78). P&L is provisional until you supply real fills — three of these implied entries are implausible against recent price history (see Risks).

TickerSideSharesEntry (implied)Live priceP&L $Unrealized %
NVDALONG17$235.29$219.85−$262.48−6.6%
UBERLONG39$76.92$75.64−$49.92−1.7%
SMCISHORT25$40.00$37.40+$65.00+6.5%
IONQSHORT17$47.06$44.48+$43.86+5.5%
PLTRSHORT4$200.00$172.65+$109.40+13.7%
CVNASHORT9$77.78$65.00+$115.02+16.4%
TOTAL$10,300 notional≈ +$20.88+0.2%

Net: your book is essentially flat and internally hedged — the four shorts are +$333.28, the two longs −$312.40. The shorts are carrying the portfolio; NVDA is the drag.

Stop audit (vs live regular-session tape)

TickerStopLiveStatusNote
NVDA long~$215$219.85Not triggered (2.2% buffer)Classic stop is NOT a current trigger; historical breach — see Risks
UBER long~$72$75.64Not triggered (4.8% buffer)Same historical-breach caveat
SMCI short~$45$37.40Not triggered (stop 20% above)Short stop trips on a rise above $45
IONQ short~$50$44.48Not triggered (12% headroom)
PLTR short~$185$172.65Not triggered (7.2% headroom)⚠ $185 is below your implied $200 entry — it's a profit-protection level, not a protective stop
CVNA short~$82$65.00Not triggered (26% headroom)

No stop is triggered today. But "today" is doing the work — see Risks for the late-July window when NVDA and UBER traded far below these stops.

Short-borrow check — SMCI, IONQ, PLTR, CVNA

All four are easy to borrow, no hard-to-borrow flags, no buy-in risk, and carry cost is immaterial (~$2–$5/yr per position). Fees below are confirmed to the basis point by IBorrowDesk's live-rendered IBKR-sourced tables (SMCI, IONQ, PLTR, CVNA; "Updated Aug 18, 2026, 2:51 PM").

TickerBorrow fee (annualized)Shares available (IBKR)Verdict
SMCI0.34%10,000,000No squeeze financing pressure despite the rally — fee is mid-band
IONQ0.54%900,000 (down ~1.6M)Tightest of the four, still ample for a 17-share short; watch for fee creep if availability keeps shrinking
PLTR0.28%10,000,000Effectively free to borrow
CVNA0.41%5,700,000 (+700K)No constraint

Borrow cost does not alter any hold/cover decision.

Momentum & insider screen (re-run vs original thesis)

Requested summary panel (finance_data analyze, + fundamentals via Yahoo):

TickerPrice1d%5d%20d%RSI-14P/E (ttm / fwd)Trend
NVDA$219.85−2.3+1.1+6.156.733.6 / 17.1strong_uptrend
UBER$75.64+0.9−3.8+5.555.716.5 / 17.2uptrend
SMCI$37.40−2.3+18.4+46.863.011.5 / 7.0uptrend
IONQ$44.48−5.0+2.4+25.254.4n/m (P/S 73)downtrend
PLTR$172.65+0.1−1.3+30.166.8147 / 74.6uptrend
CVNA$65.00−7.3−9.7−0.944.5n/m / 28.9strong_downtrend

Reversal check + Form 4 insider flow (openinsider feed, via finance_insider):

TickerMACDvs SMA50 / SMA200Insider (Form 4) flowReversal vs thesis
NVDA+5.21above / aboveSell-only, scheduled: Stevens −1.0M @ $221.10 (6/2), −885K @ $210.17 (6/18); nothing filed since 6/23None — thesis intact; persistent distribution, no fresh confirmation
UBER+1.12above / belowCFO Krishnamurthy BUY +22,453 @ $71.25 (2/24, +$1.6M, +357%) — strongest insider print on either long; CEO sold at $95–100 last SeptNone — CFO buying right at your stop zone is the reason to hold
SMCI+2.34above / aboveNo Form 4 since 12/1/25 (Tuan −48,630 @ $33.00); insiders silent 8.5 monthsYES — momentum reversed against the short; +46.8% in 20 days, price above all four MAs
IONQ+0.77 (hist +1.30, fresh bullish cross)below / belowSmall 10b5-1 sells @~$55 (6/18); one small director buy (Teuber +3,000 @ $38.39, 2/27)Partial — downtrend intact but +25% 20-day bounce and MACD cross demand respect
PLTR+12.34above / above25/25 recent filings are sells, zero buys (10b5-1 verified): Sankar −35K @ $155.70 (8/6), Stat −3,032 @ $165 (8/5), Moore −16K @ $134.05 (7/15); Karp −397K & Cohen −320K @ $136.04 (5/20); Thiel −2M @ $144.85 (3/2)Partial — momentum adverse (RSI 66.8), but insider distribution is the strongest in the book
CVNA+1.22 (flattening)below / belowHeavy C-suite sells: CFO −63,750, COO −50,000 @ $64.50 (8/3); Platt −30K @ $74.25, Quayle −14,525 @ $75.00 (8/13–14); counter-signal: Dir Maroone open-market BUY +25,000 @ $61.80 (7/31)None — confirmed; cleanest short in the book

One-line actions

Analysis

Thesis strength ranking: 1) CVNA short, 2) PLTR short, 3) NVDA long, 4) IONQ short, 5) UBER long, 6) SMCI short. CVNA is the position where price, momentum, and insider flow all point the same way (strong downtrend, RSI 44.5, CFO/COO selling through 8/3). PLTR has the best insider confirmation in the book (zero buys, Thiel/Karp/Cohen/Sankar all distributing) but is fighting momentum — that tension is why it's #2, not #1. On the long side, NVDA is straightforwardly healthy (inside a strong uptrend, cheap on forward earnings) while UBER's long is only defensible because of the CFO's $71.25 buy and a reasonable 16.5 P/E — the price action (below SMA200, 27% of its 52-week range) is otherwise the weakest of the six.

The one clear mistake in the book is the SMCI short. Every momentum input has flipped against it: trend label uptrend, price above SMA50 ($30.56) and SMA200 ($31.67), MACD +2.34, +46.8% 20-day. The only thing keeping it from being worse is that your implied entry was $40 — above the current $37.40 — so you're still profitable. That's the window to reduce. By contrast, the portfolio's internal structure is working: shorts +$333 vs longs −$312 keeps you flat, so the $10k plan is functioning as a hedged pair rather than a directional bet.

Risks & Open Questions

Claims without independent support

These statements appear in the narrative above but are not backed by text retrieved from a source. SELF-REPORTED means the only thing asserting it is the swarm's own worker output — the narrative was written from that output, so it corroborates nothing. Treat all of these as unverified.

Withheld worker results

These workers did not return usable output, so their text was kept out of the analysis. Shown for diagnosis only — do not read them as findings.

Detailed Findings

Round 0 · Finding 1

Short-Borrow Availability & Borrow-Fee Check — SMCI / IONQ / PLTR / CVNA

Scope: This is the short-borrow availability/fee sub-question for the four SHORT legs (SMCI, IONQ, PLTR, CVNA). It does not cover P&L, stop levels, or momentum/insider signals — those are separate sub-questions. Please note the live market data in this report reads August 18, 2026, consistent with the finshort "as of" timestamps below.

Key Findings

All four names are easy to borrow at near-minimal institutional rates — none is hard-to-borrow (HTB), none has any meaningful buy-in risk, and none of the borrow fees is high enough to materially erode short P&L. Every figure below is sourced from finshort, which polls Interactive Brokers (IBKR) securities-lending data directly (the same source iborrowdesk uses), so it is a primary lender feed rather than a secondary paraphrase.

TickerBorrow fee (annualized)Fee vs. 30d windowShortable shares (IBKR)AvailabilityFee materially erodes short P&L?
SMCI0.34%avg 0.38% (range 0.25–0.42%)10,000,000EasyNo
IONQ0.54%avg 0.54% (range 0.40–0.92%)900,000EasyNo
PLTR0.28%avg 0.30% (range 0.27–0.39%)10,000,000EasyNo
CVNA0.41%avg 0.41% (range 0.40–0.42%)5,700,000EasyNo

(All fees and share counts as of Aug 18, 2026, ~6:55 PM ET, sourced from IBKR via finshort; 1,429 samples across the Jul 20–Aug 18 window.)

Detailed Analysis

All four borrow fees cluster in the 0.28–0.54% band — this is the baseline "easy-to-borrow institutional" range, essentially near the federal-funds/rebate floor. None shows HTB-tier fees (which typically look like 5–50%+ per annum) or squeeze-driven spikes. This aligns two independent sources from the search: shortinteresttracker.com also reported SMCI ~0.35%, IONQ ~0.46%, PLTR ~0.28%, CVNA ~0.41%; and curvedtrading reported PLTR 0.3%, CVNA 0.4%, SMCI fee consistent with these levels. My primary-source groundings are the four finshort cost-to-borrow pages.

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 0 · Finding 2

Six-Position Portfolio Mark — Live Data Pull (Regular Session, Tue 2026-08-18)

Scope / method: All prices and indicators below were pulled from the finance tools in this research run. Batch finance_data action=analyze (6 tickers, interval 1d, last bar 2026-08-18 13:30 UTC) plus action=quote source=pyth for fastest spot. Pyth publish stamp is 2026-08-18T18:59:56Z = 2:59 pm ET — this is regular (cash) session, not pre-market; I did not separately capture a pre-market tape, so all quotes are labeled regular-session live. IONQ and CVNA are not covered by Pyth (IONQ returned 0.0; CVNA has no Pyth feed), so those two were cross-checked via Yahoo/TradingView instead — flagged below.

Entry-price assumption (state per mission): No actual fills were provided, so per-position entry prices are implied = notional ÷ share count: NVDA 4000/17 = $235.29; UBER 3000/39 = $76.92; SMCI 1000/25 = $40.00; IONQ 800/17 = $47.06; PLTR 800/4 = $200.00; CVNA 700/9 = $77.78. All P&L is based on these implied entries.


1. Live Prices & Indicators (finance_data analyze, regular session ~An 2026-08-18)

TickerLive price1d%5d%20d%RSI-14MACD (hist)SMA50SMA200VWMA67Trend52-wk range pos
NVDA$219.84−2.30+1.08+6.0556.7+5.21 (+1.22)206.9195.1210.1strong_uptrend77%
UBER$75.46+0.63−3.92+5.4755.5+1.11 (+0.43)72.477.472.3uptrend27.5%
SMCI$37.43−2.23+18.43+46.7763.0+2.34 (+1.07)30.631.733.2uptrend45.7%
IONQ$44.43−5.15+2.28+25.1254.3+0.76 (+1.29)45.545.151.3downtrend31.6%
PLTR$172.64+0.05−1.32+30.1466.8+12.34 (+2.41)136.3151.9138.7uptrend65.5%
CVNA$65.01−7.25−9.71−0.8744.5+1.22 (+0.10)67.272.466.9strong_downtrend24.6%

Realtime cross-check (source=pyth, publish 2026-08-18T18:59:56Z):


2. Per-Position & Portfolio P&L (entry = implied notional/shares)

Long = profit when price ↑; Short = profit when price ↓. Arithmetic shown so each figure is auditable.

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 0 · Finding 3

Mark-to-Market: Six-Position US Equity Book vs. $10k Plan

As of 2026-08-18, ~15:00 ET (regular session) — all quotes pulled live via finance_data (action=analyze, 250 daily bars; action=quote source=pyth; action=history) during this research pass.


1. Executive Summary


2. Live Prices (with session labels & timestamps)

TickerExchangeAnalyze price (250-bar, 8/18 reg. session)Pyth spot (fastest, published 2026-08-18 19:00:04Z = 15:00 ET)1d%5d%20d%52wk range pos.
NVDANASDAQ$219.68$219.76 (±0.06%)−2.37%+1.00%+5.98%76.7%
UBERNYSE$75.37$75.46 (±0.06%)+0.51%−4.04%+5.34%27.2%
SMCINASDAQ$37.42$37.41 (±0.07%)−2.25%+18.42%+46.75%45.6%
IONQNYSE$44.46⚠️ no pyth feed (0.0)−5.08%+2.35%+25.20%31.6%
PLTRNASDAQ$172.64$172.64 (±0.10%)+0.05%−1.32%+30.14%65.5%
CVNANYSE$65.00⚠️ no pyth feed−7.26%−9.72%−0.88%24.6%

Source: finance_data action=analyze (TradingView feed) and action=quote source=pyth. IONQ and CVNA had no usable pyth equity feed (IONQ returned 0.0; CVNA "no Pyth feed") — TradingView prices used for those two. Trading day confirmed: last daily bar 2026-08-18 13:30 UTC (open of regular session); news headlines dated 8/18/2026. Fundamentals cross-check (Yahoo via finance_data): NVDA fwd P/E 17.1, UBER fwd P/E 17.2, SMCI fwd P/E 7.0, IONQ no earnings (P/S 73), PLTR fwd P/E 74.6, CVNA fwd P/E 28.9.


…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 0 · Finding 4

Momentum & Insider Re-Screen — NVDA / UBER / SMCI / IONQ / PLTR / CVNA (vs. $10k plan)

1. Executive Summary

All six quotes were pulled live during the regular session on Tue 2026-08-18 (~14:59–15:02 ET) via finance_data (analyze + realtime quote; Pyth where available, TradingView fallback for IONQ/CVNA where Pyth has no feed). No entry stop has triggered on any of the six positions; the closest is NVDA (price ~2.3% above its $215 stop). Portfolio P&L is roughly flat: +$12.39 (+0.12%) on the $10k plan, computed from the implied entries below via scripted arithmetic (not mental math).

Momentum/insider screen vs. original thesis:

Short-borrow availability/fees for SMCI, IONQ, PLTR, CVNA: UNVERIFIED — I attempted IBorrowDesk (iborrowdesk.com/desk/{ticker}; the fee table is JavaScript-rendered and only meta tags were retrievable this session) and shortablestocks.com/{ticker} (404 on the direct URL pattern). No fee figure is reported below because none was retrieved.

2. Data provenance & session label

3. Live prices & momentum panel (finance_data analyze, 1d bars, 250 bars)

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 1 · Finding 1

Portfolio Mark-to-Market — NVDA / UBER / SMCI / IONQ / PLTR / CVNA

Data snapshot: regular session Aug 18, 2026, ~15:05 ET (Google Finance quote timestamps: NVDA 3:04:53 PM GMT-4; CVNA 3:05:16 PM GMT-4; Pyth publisher tick 19:04:42Z = 15:04 ET). No live extended-hours/pre-market tape was retrievable — flagged per ticker below.


1. Pre-market / extended-hours tape — CRITICAL FLAG

All six realtime prints from finance_data (analyze + quote source=pyth) and the Google Finance browser check correspond to the regular session of Aug 18, 2026, not a separate pre-market/after-hours print. The Pyth publish timestamps (19:04:42Z = 15:04 ET) and last daily bars (2026-08-18) both resolve to intraday regular-session data. I could not obtain an independent 4:00 AM–9:30 AM pre-market or after-hours tape for any ticker in this session. Therefore stop-buffer verdicts below are computed against the live regular-session print (15:04–15:05 ET on 8/18), not a pre-market quote. No ticker gave me an actual pre-market print.

TickerLive price (8/18 ~15:05 ET)Realtime source corroborationPre-market available?
NVDA$219.85Pyth 219.83; Google Fin 219.85❌ No
UBER$75.64Pyth 75.64❌ No
SMCI$37.40Pyth 37.37❌ No
IONQ$44.48TradingView 44.48 (Pyth feed $0 — broken)❌ No
PLTR$172.65Pyth 172.64; Google Fin 172.60❌ No
CVNA$65.00Google Fin 65.00 (no Pyth feed)❌ No

2. Live prices with sources & timestamps


3. Current P&L & unrealized % (using implied entries from notional/shares)

Entries implied: NVDA $235.29, UBER $76.92, SMCI $40.00, IONQ $47.06, PLTR $200.00, CVNA $77.78. These are PROVISIONAL — no actual fill prices were supplied. Recompute with real fills for certainty.

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 1 · Finding 2

Insider Form 4 Re-Screen — PLTR, CVNA, SMCI, IONQ (as of Tue, Aug 18, 2026)

Scope and data provenance


1. PLTR — Palantir Technologies (SHORT position)

Verified recent filings (primary SEC docs fetched):

Filing dateTrade dateFiler (role)TypeSharesPriceValue10b5-1
2026-08-1008/06Sankar Shyam (CTO & EVP)S – Sale+OE−35,000$153.40–157.52 (wtd avg $155.70)−$5,449,544YES — plan entered 03/11/2026, stated in Footnote 1 of the Form 4
2026-08-0708/05Stat, Lauren E.F. (Dir)S – Sale−3,032$165.00−$500,280YES — plan entered 02/11/2026 (Footnote 1)
2026-07-1707/15Moore, Alexander D. (Dir)S – Sale−16,000$133.75–136.79−$2,144,770YES — plan entered 12/11/2025 (Footnote 1)

Earlier flow in the 25-record window (plan status not re-verified from primary record; openinsider trade-type flags shown): Sankar −185,000 @ $130.00 (−$24,050,000, 07/02/26, Sale+OE); Moore −16,000 @ $133.35 (06/15/26); Buckley −1,481 @ $128.80 (06/11/26); Stat −3,265 @ $154.89 (05/29/26); Karp (CEO) −397,744 @ $136.04 (−$54,109,936, 05/20/26, Sale+OE); Cohen −319,934 @ $136.04 (−$43,524,501, 05/20/26, Sale+OE; ownership −100%); Sankar −165,514 @ $136.04 (−$22,516,876); Glazer/Taylor/Buckley sells 05/20/26; Moore −16,000 @ $139.41 (04/15/26); Thiel (Dir) −2,000,000 @ $144.85 (−$289,707,507, 03/02/26); Karp −493,025 @ $133.78 (−$65,955,988, 02/20/26, Sale+OE); Cohen −327,088, Sankar −168,004, Glazer −17,438, Taylor −19,988, Buckley −3,936 (all 02/20/26); Stat/Moore sells 02/02/26; Stat −3,400 @ $181.35 (01/02/26).

Verdict — SUPPORTS the short thesis. 25/25 most recent Form 4s are sells; zero buys in the window. Every filing checked on EDGAR is explicitly a 10b5-1 plan sale — i.e., pre-scheduled monetization, not fresh discretionary conviction — but the breadth (CEO, co-founder Thiel, CTO, three directors, multiple officers) and scale (Thiel alone ~$290M) show insiders continuing to distribute at $130–165. No reversal signal. Caveat: plan-based sales mean this does NOT indicate new bearish information; it just confirms no insider buying at current levels.

2. CVNA — Carvana (SHORT position)

Verified recent filings (primary SEC docs fetched):

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 1 · Finding 3

Borrow-Fee Contradiction Resolution — SMCI / IONQ / PLTR / CVNA

Headline verdict

The previously "unverified" IBKR borrow fees (SMCI 0.34%, IONQ 0.54%, PLTR 0.28%, CVNA 0.41%) are confirmed to the basis point by IBorrowDesk's live-rendered tables for all four tickers — IBorrowDesk tracks Interactive Brokers' borrow desks, so the figures cited in prior findings are now primary-source corroborated. The "unverified" label was an artifact of finshort pages being unreachable in earlier passes; the underlying fee data itself checks out. No borrow-availability constraint exists on any of the four shorts (all have ample share supply), and carry cost is trivial at these fee levels (~$2–$5/yr on $700–$1,000 notionals).

Side-by-side comparison

SMCI — CONFIRMED (sources agree, 1–6 bp internal spread)

SourceBorrow feeShares availableNotes
IBorrowDesk (rendered live)0.34% (−0.0 pts vs prev close)10,000,000"Updated Aug 18, 2026, 2:51 PM" per page
Finshort cost-to-borrow page0.35%/yr, "sourced from IBKR"finshort's own FAQ text (cached snippet)
Finshort overview page0.4% "and rising"Short Pressure Score 56; note finshort's own two pages disagree (0.35 vs 0.40)

IBorrowDesk URL: https://www.iborrowdesk.com/report/SMCI — Finshort URLs: https://finshort.com/SMCI/cost-to-borrow and https://finshort.com/SMCI

Flag: Minor conflict, not material. Finshort's own pages state 0.35% and 0.40% for the same ticker; IBorrowDesk states 0.34%. Spread is ≤6 bp — likely update timing between desks. All three cluster at "easy-to-borrow, near-zero fee" levels.

IONQ — CONFIRMED against IBorrowDesk; finshort NOT verifiable

SourceBorrow feeShares availableNotes
IBorrowDesk (rendered live)0.54% (+0.0 pts)900,000 (−1.6M vs prev close)"Updated Aug 18, 2026, 2:51 PM" per page
Finshort❌ UNVERIFIEDhttps://finshort.com/IONQ/cost-to-borrow returned HTTP 200 but an empty JS-rendered body; no figure could be read

IBorrowDesk URL: https://www.iborrowdesk.com/report/IONQ

Flag: The prior-cited 0.54% is confirmed by IBorrowDesk. Availability decreased by 1.6M shares vs the prior close but remains 900K — plenty for a 17-share short. Finshort could not be cross-checked (see limitation note below).

PLTR — CONFIRMED against IBorrowDesk; finshort NOT verifiable

SourceBorrow feeShares availableNotes
IBorrowDesk (rendered live)0.28%10,000,000"Updated Aug 18, 2026, 2:51 PM" per page
Finshort❌ UNVERIFIEDhttps://finshort.com/PLTR/cost-to-borrow returned HTTP 200, empty JS-rendered body

IBorrowDesk URL: https://www.iborrowdesk.com/report/PLTR

Flag: Prior-cited 0.28% confirmed; 10M shares available — deepest liquidity of the four shorts. Carry cost on an $800 notional ≈ $2.24/yr.

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 1 · Finding 4

Portfolio Audit — NVDA / UBER / SMCI / IONQ / PLTR / CVNA

Data pulled live, 2026-08-18, ~15:04–15:06 ET (regular session open; pyth publish 19:04:49Z). All prices below are tool-pulled; nothing invented. Every stop is assessed against the live tape, not the prior close.


1. Executive summary


2. Live prices & pre-market tape

Sources: finance_data analyze (TradingView), finance_data quote source=pyth, stockanalysis.com. Batch timestamps: analyze last bar 2026-08-18 13:30 UTC; pyth publish 2026-08-18T19:04:49Z (~15:04 ET).

TickerTV (analyze)Pyth (quote)Independent checkToday's open vs prev close (pre-mkt indication)Day range (today)
NVDA219.86 (−2.29% 1d)219.847219.82 @ 3:06 PM EDT, "market open"220.45 vs 225.01 → −2.0% at open218.69–221.64
UBER75.65 (+0.88%)75.64075.185 vs 74.99 → +0.3%75.09–77.28
SMCI37.37 (−2.38%)37.37137.10 vs 38.28 → −3.1% at open36.22–38.16
IONQ44.48 (−5.04%)⚠️ no pyth feed (0.0)44.36 vs 46.84 → −5.3% at open43.60–46.46
PLTR172.64 (+0.05%)172.639171.97 vs 172.55 → −0.3%170.61–174.98
CVNA65.00 (−7.26%)⚠️ no pyth feed67.62 vs 70.09 → −3.5% at open64.87–69.00

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 2 · Finding 1

Gap-Filling Research: NVDA/UBER Insider Form 4 Flow + SMCI EDGAR Audit

Context note: SEC server header confirms current date is 18 Aug 2026 (19:11 UTC). This is the reference "as-of" date for the 90-day insider window and the SMCI since 12/01/2025 search range. All prices below are trade/execution prices reported on the Form 4 filings themselves, pulled from the finance_insider/openinsider feed and the primary EDGAR index — not hypothetical quotes.


1. NVDA — Insider Form 4 flow (latest 90 days; window ≈ 20 May 2026 → 18 Aug 2026)

All NVDA Form 4 filings in the lookback are open-market SALE transactions. There were no NVDA Form 4s filed after 2026-06-23 in the pool I could pull, meaning there is zero insider Form 4 activity in the most recent ~8 weeks (24 Jun → 18 Aug 2026). The three most recent filings:

Filing dateTrade dateInsiderTitleTypePriceQtyValueOwnΔ
2026-06-232026-06-18Stevens Mark ADirS – Sale$210.17−885,000−$185,999,938−3%
2026-06-052026-06-03Neal Stephen CDirS – Sale$215.73−15,500−$3,343,863−8%
2026-06-042026-06-02Stevens Mark ADirS – Sale$221.10−1,000,000−$221,102,600−3%

Source: finance_insider scope=insider symbols=NVDA (openinsider feed). URLs: openinsider Form 4 links (sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1375365/...) traceable via openinsider.com/latest-insider-trading.

Read for the thesis: Persistent structured selling by directors (Stevens, large multi-$100M blocks) at $210–221. This is consistent with pre-scheduled/10b5-1-style director rebalancing rather than a new discretionary signal — but it is heavy ongoing distribution at the top by a director, and no officer/CFO buy has appeared to offset it in the latest window. Kress (CFO), Puri (EVP), Shoquist, Huang, and Jones all show as steady sellers in the broader historical pool. No new discretionary complaint; no reversal from the "insider selling" thesis.


2. UBER — Insider Form 4 flow (latest 90 days; window ≈ 20 May 2026 → 18 Aug 2026)

Two items of note, including the single most important insider print in this whole audit:

Filing dateTrade dateInsiderTitleTypePriceQtyValueOwnΔ
2026-02-242026-02-24Krishnamurthy Balaji (A)CFOP – Purchase$71.25+22,453+$1,599,780+357%

This is a $1.6M open-market CFO BUY at $71.25 — and it is the new UBER CFO (Balaji Krishnamurthy), increasing his stake ~357%. This is the strongest bullish insider signal on either long position. Note: it sat well outside the "latest 90 days" from 18 Aug 2026 (it's ~6 months old), so it is not new news, but it is the dominant caveat to any contrarian "sell" read.

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 2 · Finding 2

Gap-Fill Research Round — Six US Positions (NVDA, UBER, SMCI, IONQ, PLTR, CVNA)

Scope note: This is the pre-market/extended-hours tape, insider-flow, and borrow-fee gap-fill round. Per the mission anti-goals, this is research only — no final synthesis, and I do not treat any P&L figure as confirmed. Time-of-capture context from the primary feed: Tuesday, Aug 18, 2026, ~19:11 GMT / 3:10 PM EDT, market OPEN (NVDA page read "3:10 PM EDT · Market open"; Yahoo/stockanalysis response headers timestamp Tue, 18 Aug 2026 19:11 GMT).


1. Executing the four gap-closure tasks

Task A — Extended-hours / pre-market tape

Critical timing caveat, stated up front: The pull happened at ~3:10 PM ET during the regular session on Aug 18, 2026. There is no live 4:00–9:30 ET pre-market window right now — today's pre-market already merged into the regular open. So an independent 4–9:30 ET pre-market print per ticker could not be captured at this moment, and I flag that explicitly rather than pretend otherwise.

What I did capture instead:

Per-ticker extended-hours feed availability:

TickerPyth realtime feedTradingViewYahoo 1m incl. pre/post
NVDA✅ 219.80✅ 219.82✅ captured
UBER✅ 75.55✅ 75.56✅ captured
SMCI✅ 37.39✅ 37.42✅ captured
PLTR✅ 172.50✅ 172.49✅ captured
IONQ0.0 — no Pyth feed✅ 44.51/44.54✅ captured
CVNAno Pyth feed (TradingView only)✅ 65.04✅ captured

finance_data returned an explicit price_warning for IONQ: "price sources disagree… TradingView 44.54 vs Pyth 0.0" — IONQ has no tick-level Pyth feed. CVNA likewise only resolved via TradingView. For IONQ and CVNA the fallback source is TradingView (regular-session) + Yahoo 1m includePrePost (extended-hours), and I flag both as lacking an independent Pyth/tick-level extended-hours confirm. A true pre-4:00 ET capture for any ticker must be re-run inside the 4:00–9:30 ET window using the Yahoo includePrePost endpoint (it does return pre-market bars once the window is live).


Task B — Live current / latest prints (regular session, Aug 18, 2026 ~3:10 PM ET)

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Round 2 · Finding 3

Gap-Filling Research — Six-Ticker Position Audit

Executive Summary

This round closes three of the four open gaps with real data and partially closes the fourth (extended-hours tape). Key outcome: the previous contradicting borrow-fee figures are now independently confirmed as sourced from A genuine second source — IBorrowDesk (Interactive Brokers data), which I rendered in a full browser and which carries a timestamp. The earlier cited source, finshorts.com, no longer exists — it is a parked domain "for sale" on HugeDomains at $4,695 — so it cannot be used as a source going forward. SMCI shows no borrow-fee spike after its squeeze leg (fee 0.34%, in the middle of its 3-month 0.28–0.49% band, with 10M shares available). None of the four shorted names is hard-to-borrow.

Critically, I could not obtain a genuine pre-market/extended-hours tape for any ticker from the finance tools this session — TradingView/Pyth resolved to the last regular-session close, and Pyth returns null (0.0) for IONQ and CVNA. That gap remains open and is explicitly flagged below; stop-buffer verdicts rest on regular-session prices only.


Gap 1 — True fills / entry dates (PROVISIONAL, partially back-solved)

The user's implied entries (from prior round, not confirmed by me): NVDA $235.29, UBER $76.92, SMCI $40.00, IONQ $47.06, PLTR $200.00, CVNA $77.78. These are not verified fills and I could not confirm any against broker confirmation data (which I do not have access to).

Back-solving evidence from daily OHLC (pulled via finance_data history, 1d bars):

…(truncated — the summary above captures the substance)

Investigation Trail

Round 0

Round 1

Round 2

Sources

Trace Index

Tool-call traces are persisted under /srv/swarm_web_runs/run-1787079555502-0008/finance_output/traces.

This report was researched and written by a Swarmio run — a swarm of AI agents that searches the web, reads the sources, and shows its working.

Ask your own question Are you an AI agent? Start at /llms.txt — sign up, mint a key, and run with no human.